Sunday, March 28, 2010

-kun What Does This Mean In Japanese




Review by Luke Leonard Rimbotti
("Line" - 28-3-10 -).
.
not Galileo's Dialogue around the Two Chief World Systems. Not the Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, I mean that famous pamphlet that served as inspiration ai Protocolli dei Savi di Sion. E non è neppure le Conversazioni a tavola del Führer. Qui sembra d'essere al cospetto di uno di quei dialoghi semiseri con cui certi philosophes illuministi componevano con molto ésprit de finesse i loro pamphlet di demolizione dell' ancient Règime . Carlo Gambescia e Nicola Vacca, l'uno sociologo liberal-cattolico e l'altro scrittore laico-socialista, buttano il corpaccione della “destra” italiana nella macina della critica del giudizio, con tutte le frattaglie, grandi e piccole, con tutti i rimasugli e i detriti di cui quel relitto antistorico è intriso. Sottopongono quella straziata creatura allo sferzante giudizio di una logica che si direbbe catto-lib-lab e... da quest'operazione di spremitura senza sconti, dài e ridài, non esce un bel nulla. Sfogli, leggi, riguardi, segui le argomentazioni, le battute, i rimandi colti e quelli en passant... e alla fine capisci. Ciò che si era intuito, così, alla buona, dunque è vero: in Italia, di una “destra”, che sia uno straccio di “destra”, non v'è traccia.
Leggendo A Destra per caso. Conversazioni su un viaggio (Edizioni Il Foglio) si capisce che all'Italia manca una fetta di arco costituzionale, come dire, è orba di tutta una cultura politica che ebbe i sui fasti, i suoi bei nomi, e che insomma si riassume sotto la sigla di liberalismo national. Gambescia and Vacca have for everyone, and clap a lot on the nail ends and Finian, resisting their historical role, in flight with great loss of credibility between the legs of the "left" feel-good and systemic. One might ask, but at this point, what have Fini and Finian with the "right" with any "right"? And what they have to do them with a political culture independent, alternative, perhaps to promote what should be the first article of the decalogue of a "right" any, that the firm defense of national identity? Gambescia expresses the concept when he speaks of Finian in ten-year struggle against everything that smacks of culture and political culture. This trend seems to not subverted, but reaffirmed by the avalanche of names thrown in there haphazardly by Fini himself, in what is his unexpected Mein Kampf postmodernism mean the unknown, frightening book called, stained Democrat The Future of Freedom , with which the "Special One " the former "right", to general amazement, it becomes Socratic, "Fini, in fact - wrote Gambescia - human knowledge has bothered to educate a generation to address the challenges of the epoch-making change that increasingly switching to the concept of cosmopolitan freedom. " Well said. Converge in the titanic effort, which has a mountain bore the names of old rat-Jacobin Masonic individual rights and "constitutional patriotism", probably Fini will be done by hand to keep the uncertain temper than, say, a field ... or maybe even a Croppi? And for these, as all the cultural circus that revolves around the "right there" and cows Gambescia have heavy foot ... Cardini, Malgieri, Buttafuoco, Venetian ... would you say that we do not save one: "a right far-fetched, some 'futuristic, a little' anarchist, but so imaginary ...». Sketches of vitriolic criticism is spread throughout the pages irreverent pamphlet, which would be polite and considerate, drawing-room and cynical, and yet here and there squad is in good style ... the ax finally there and finally the half of the queens have weak thought that they deserve.
Gambescia Vacca and would have gone down even harder still, mind you, to Papineau, the Giuliotti ... invective Stan the coward, the cowardly afresh, have you ever seen that he does not take even a few spring ... but in short, be satisfied, which is quite something. In fact, the two heretics of national conservatism, on the one hand linger to regret the compromises of evil "right" weak, "The new right in the myths of the left willingly stumbles ... is very similar to the "right weird" in recent Fini years, in perfect solitude, is building and would really like to his political opponents' ... the other side open to the overcoming of the dualism of Gnosticism sclerotic Democratic - such as "anti-fascism-fascism" - and the appreciation of that one attempt, let us say, that in key political and cultural been achieved in recent decades to plant in ace ideological immaturity and poverty summary of the Democratic Italian: the New Right of Tarceva. "High mountains of ideas" is defined metapolitical island location.
Only, then, is banal. When Gambescia between some possible testimonial history, mentions that there has been a fascist "Libertarian", that at least "increase the pool of civil rights, promoting the right to work, housing, health, social security ...», Vacca comes out with an improper" sin that neglecting the political rights " . But those rights were politicians. They were especially politicians. Much more political than not going to put a ballot in the urn every tot of years, in a system that if the policy is quite above the heads of "free" citizens happy and split ... is not it?
Gambescia calls "a right that has been soaked in political liberalism of which I spoke, and therefore able to impose rules al mercato...», ma teme le derive “totalitarie” di un'opposizione radicale...Intanto, mentre l'atroce dilemma non viene sciolto, il libero mercato, la cosa più libera e insieme più totalitaria che abbia mai prodotto il liberalismo, finisce la sua opera di annientamento dei legami sociali e delle identità.
È un peccato, perchè ai nostri eroi piacciono Aron, Croce, Pareto... tutta gente che, quando occorreva, sapeva metter mano alla leva radicale... Ma noi incalziamo: un passo ancora e ci si imbatte in Gentile, in Costamagna... un altro piccolo sforzo e ci si ritrova dalle parti di Bottai e Ugo Spirito... insomma, la direzione potrebbe essere quella giusta, si tratta solo di essere dinamici e di iniziare a journey.
In this sense, I, modestly, to Gambescia and Vacca, between ourselves, to give some advice to feel comfortable with their ideas I would have: take the plunge. Forget the "right". That's a rip off in history. You are sending the Catholic and socialist? Very good. Admire the national political culture - because this was - that was the time, Max Weber, Ortega, Prezzolini? Excellent. It would like a modern day equal sign, to give content to a large party of national identity? Even better. There is the "Fascism of the millennium", a shoot without father or mother, deserted street in the wrong way, which is waiting with open arms that Scion dishonored waiting for someone to adopt, to give him a healthy tonic ideological: the historical period can be used as small. Tough job, of course, but intriguing. And then the future is immense. So, at work, friends. In this great work of brave and tenacious precursors out of date, you're never alone ..
Luke Leonard Rimbotti
.

0 comments:

Post a Comment