Recensione di Gianfranco Franchi su "Lankelot " - 05/05/2010
. "A destra per caso" è un pamphlet nato sulla scia di una convinzione di Sciascia; ossia che ogni scrittore è politico, e che il giusto sentiero della scrittura politica è offrire la propria responsabilità a tutti. E così Carlo Gambescia e Nicola Vacca raccontano la loro esperienza di intellettuali e giornalisti culturali passati, accidentalmente, a scrivere per l'area politica destrorsa, nel periodo delle sue maggiori trasformazioni ideali, essenziali ed estetiche; l'esperienza di Gambescia Vacca and then finished to suffer too much confusion and an unprecedented estrangement. In this curious book illustrating and explaining everything, taking a position with an appreciable (basically) clarity, naming and criticizing a number of people, for better or for worse. Common to both is the idol was Giano Accame ("true intellectual," "prodigious memory," and Socratic dialogue, "" great journalist, "" great writer "," full of candor and humility, "" a real irregular " ), high praise for Enzo Cipriano ("great traditionalist," "Seventh Seal landmark," "a culture without compromise"); common enemies seem to be Marcello Veneziani (narcissism at work " "il Veneziani non conforme è durato poco", "solipsista", "non è un portatore sano di idee") e Buttafuoco ("collaborazionista del nulla", "si è perso nel nulla", "è sempre stato il nulla", "fautore di una destra campata in aria"). Il tono del libro – si intuirà – è questo: molto diretto, spesso scomposto, sempre aggressivo. Peccato manchino le risposte della controparte: sarebbe stato bello, sarebbe stato saggio, sarebbe stato giusto dare voce agli oppositori, magari spedendo loro domande scritte e pubblicando, eventualmente, "no comment" al posto delle risposte mancanti. Così com'è, "A destra per caso" corre il rischio di essere percepito come un ibrido tra un romantico amarcord e un sinistro regolamento di conti; un regolamento di conti che sembra una sassaiola. Una sassaiola fitta, diretta alle finestre di casa di parecchie persone, dopo essersi sincerati che non c'era nessuno in casa. Sarebbe stato meglio bussare, parlare, chiarire e poi al limite litigare. Non è accaduto.
**
Ingenerose le critiche a Croppi, ex direttore editoriale di Vallecchi, presentato semplicemente come "grafico". Mi sembra un giudizio molto ingiusto, e davvero eccessivamente superficiale. Ma non sono le uniche critiche che ho trovato fastidiose o rancorose. Mi trovo a scrivere di questo libro nella posizione di chi collabora con un quotidiano storico come "Il Secolo d'Italia", da qualche mese, and who has good relations with the editorial director, Luciano Lanna: in my experience, what Gambescia Vacca and write about Lanna and the "Century" of 2010 is not sensible, it is not true and is incorrect. From subscriber to the newspaper, I read articles of great breadth and understanding, signed by Cardini, Lanna, Alfatti Appetites, young Scianca: just to name a few. It is true that I met, occasionally, articles and cutting nazionalpopolare argument: not only is this action a minority, it is - from what I read in the last four months - to work or self-mocking irony, the absolute majority of cases . When missing the irony, we would surely object. But I think a newspaper should not fade away in the ivory tower of radicalism, of experimentalism and dell'atipicità: culture, I too am very sorry but this is so, is also popular. It is even popular. It's about learn to write with the right balance. Without confusing what is popular with what is populist, for example.
seems to me that the clever opening of the "Century" to all Italian citizens, and not only to voters and former militants of AN, may be prodromal to the foundation of something new. I like to dream - as a reader, beware! - That this something new there is no room for misunderstandings and berluscones forzisti, and nostalgia for Veltroni, per casacche cambiate in fretta e poi riposte nello sgabuzzino. Lo dico da lettore, e lo dico da collaboratore. Carlo e Nicola non sono d'accordo: "Il Secolo d'Italia", viene considerato decaduto, Vacca rimpiange "una comunità di amici di penna che lavorava all'unisono", con qualche eccezione (nomina con nome e cognome "autentici venditori di fumo": non li conosco e non posso sottoscrivere né smentire). Non partecipo alle riunioni redazionali del "Secolo" di oggi, ma immagino che esistano ancora, e che siano fertili e creative.
Vacca deplora quella che ritiene una "svolta pop o yéyé" del quotidiano, nata, a suo avviso, per rincorrere quello che chiama "veltronismo culturale" (p. 85), rivendicando "paginate whole of great cultural importance "(p. 23), tolerated with impatience by Fini because" non-organic line of An. "But now, according to Nicholas says, the" Finian's complement "(p. 41) that line new: according to Vacca and Gambescia, "farewell debate and analysis, and reviews on topics glamorous in a nutshell" (p. 42). These reviews in a nutshell - I mean really - I read them too: sin here, I have found from 5 thousand to 13 thousand jokes from Tuesday to Saturday. And I wondered what else could read daily short essays like these, not just reviews. In network happens very rarely on paper. As for the glamorous, even as I come from journalistic experience (5-6 anni fa) in cui quella parola dovevo scriverla davvero, per trentamila lettori al mese, mi arrogo il diritto di saperlo riconoscere. Mi spiace, Nico': il "Secolo" non è "glam", e non è nemmeno "glitter", e non è nemmeno "vintage". È un quotidiano atipico. Un laboratorio di idee, memorie, sogni. Parlo da lettore abbonato.
Vacca definisce il "Secolo" espressione di una "destra anemica": possibile, considerato che si tratta dell'unico quotidiano di destra capace di mostrare posizioni mai subalterne e spesso alternative e autonome rispetto al sultanato? Direi proprio di no. Ma poi aggiunge: "destra libertaria è solo un ossimoro che terrorizza. Mi sembra una trovata da pop-art – dice Vacca – to mask the imagination through a tragically nothing further "(p. 57). I see it differently: the libertarian right is a unique cultural heritage for a nation that wants to see (do not hold: there is ...) I live credible and the debate between the forces of cultural hegemony of the former Marxist, Catholic ones, those liberals, reformist and the conservative: it must begin from the existing cultural heritage and unexplored, to restore the conditions for a constructive dialogue (made of clashes, even harsh) between the parties.
Vacca was and is from "a certain idea of \u200b\u200bthe left": that of Carlo Rosselli, one of Turati: socialism and liberal reformism. Party reference PSI. Vacca collaborated with the "Next", then passed to the "Newspaper of Italy" and finally, through his friendship with Gennaro Malgieri, the "Century of Italy." In recent years, has collaborated with "Line".
Gambescia instead comes from the Catholic social culture, oriented toward a "realist liberalism." Gambescia passed right by working with the "New Right" by Marco Tarchi, then thirty, animator of the magazine "Diorama". Their intellectual common reference, then, it was Sorokin. The cultural battle antimissina was "full and informed acceptance of the rules and content of democracy and fascism avant la lettre (p. 30). Gambescia then went to work with "Area" of Aleman and issues Seventh Seal (nine years): Tarceva did not like. Currently, he works with "Line".
Gambescia and cows are extremely critical of the Finian: characterized, in order, to be "left with caviar and not Bombacci" (forgive me but I prefer the caviar), a reformist considered unrealistic, from "do not tumble things change, "from" supersonic speed of change of horse "and believe that it is more right, because" a genuine anti-fascist right is not defined, but feels dead together to anti-fascism "(p. 55). Here Fini has become the "champion of the left radical chic" (p. 76), and so on. Professor Fields (Farefuturo) is defined as "praetorian who plays the tears of Fini" (p. 19). Farefuturo, "the toy of Fini, the prince of this workshop talking heads" (p. 44), "pseudodestra serving plutocrats" (p. 48). The plutocrats would need to name, but transeamus. Spiritual father of this new right, however, should be, according to Vacca and Gambescia, Prezzolini: the book as shown unequivocally starting point is "Interview on the Right."
In short, the moral of the story seems to be that those who came from DC or PSI, feels, in 2010, of having to go to say to those who came from the MSI is and what is not right, what had MSI, and what aennino, and What should be finiano. I find it a great exercise in creativity and friendship, from this point of view: it is as if I worked for ten years or for two years with the "Manifesto", with "La Padania", or "Future", and all of Suddenly, after I left, felt you want to say to former colleagues is what Communist League thing, or what the Catholic people. All this proves - if proof were ever needed - that the libertarian right [not that berlusconide: please!] And there was no room for the views and contributions of everyone and that there is a large hunger for new ideas and ideals, and that there is openness and readiness for dialogue and confrontation, always.
It is clear that since 1989 has collapsed a world based on the terrible ideological contrasts and ideals that we are living in this gray and depressing period after Berlusconi's "Clean Hands" (period I would say no more pentapartitico: esapartitico considering the presence of former MSI, according to the components of the chaotic PDL) is a period of transition to a new world.
I dream about this new world libertarian, democratic and Europe. The dialectical dream, the enemy of corruption and party politics. The dream frank, open: neo-neo-left and right, spiritual and no longer hooked to the twentieth century or the nineteenth century [...], finally able to go back to look up at the dawn of civilization to form and constitute a new paradigm. And the new paradigm is formed only looking forward. What
Nicola and Carlo have felt the need to say that the colorful world, heretic, irregular and unpredictable former right MSI are a lot of things happened and there have been comparisons, fights, broken, change it gives me great pleasure, much less I am pleased to read attacks on the newspaper I work with and people I know and what I love for what they are and for the loyalty and honesty that have shown towards me.
I should have read this book from their peers, to understand many other dynamics that name and describe briefly, but unfortunately, the fifteen or twenty years of experience and knowledge that separate us, they put me in a position to shake his head often faced with certain names or certain directions, because they do not remember or do not know or do not concern me at all.
not it be better to write a book about the "new right" imagined by Nicola and Carlo, rather than play the target practice (one step away from 'ndo cojo cojo) with colleagues, friends or former friends? I say yes.
Gambescia and cows are extremely critical of the Finian: characterized, in order, to be "left with caviar and not Bombacci" (forgive me but I prefer the caviar), a reformist considered unrealistic, from "do not tumble things change, "from" supersonic speed of change of horse "and believe that it is more right, because" a genuine anti-fascist right is not defined, but feels dead together to anti-fascism "(p. 55). Here Fini has become the "champion of the left radical chic" (p. 76), and so on. Professor Fields (Farefuturo) is defined as "praetorian who plays the tears of Fini" (p. 19). Farefuturo, "the toy of Fini, the prince of this workshop talking heads" (p. 44), "pseudodestra serving plutocrats" (p. 48). The plutocrats would need to name, but transeamus. Spiritual father of this new right, however, should be, according to Vacca and Gambescia, Prezzolini: the book as shown unequivocally starting point is "Interview on the Right."
In short, the moral of the story seems to be that those who came from DC or PSI, feels, in 2010, of having to go to say to those who came from the MSI is and what is not right, what had MSI, and what aennino, and What should be finiano. I find it a great exercise in creativity and friendship, from this point of view: it is as if I worked for ten years or for two years with the "Manifesto", with "La Padania", or "Future", and all of Suddenly, after I left, felt you want to say to former colleagues is what Communist League thing, or what the Catholic people. All this proves - if proof were ever needed - that the libertarian right [not that berlusconide: please!] And there was no room for the views and contributions of everyone and that there is a large hunger for new ideas and ideals, and that there is openness and readiness for dialogue and confrontation, always.
It is clear that since 1989 has collapsed a world based on the terrible ideological contrasts and ideals that we are living in this gray and depressing period after Berlusconi's "Clean Hands" (period I would say no more pentapartitico: esapartitico considering the presence of former MSI, according to the components of the chaotic PDL) is a period of transition to a new world.
I dream about this new world libertarian, democratic and Europe. The dialectical dream, the enemy of corruption and party politics. The dream frank, open: neo-neo-left and right, spiritual and no longer hooked to the twentieth century or the nineteenth century [...], finally able to go back to look up at the dawn of civilization to form and constitute a new paradigm. And the new paradigm is formed only looking forward. What
Nicola and Carlo have felt the need to say that the colorful world, heretic, irregular and unpredictable former right MSI are a lot of things happened and there have been comparisons, fights, broken, change it gives me great pleasure, much less I am pleased to read attacks on the newspaper I work with and people I know and what I love for what they are and for the loyalty and honesty that have shown towards me.
I should have read this book from their peers, to understand many other dynamics that name and describe briefly, but unfortunately, the fifteen or twenty years of experience and knowledge that separate us, they put me in a position to shake his head often faced with certain names or certain directions, because they do not remember or do not know or do not concern me at all.
not it be better to write a book about the "new right" imagined by Nicola and Carlo, rather than play the target practice (one step away from 'ndo cojo cojo) with colleagues, friends or former friends? I say yes.
.
Gianfranco Franchi
0 comments:
Post a Comment